ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
J. R. DiStefano
Nuclear Technology | Volume 17 | Number 2 | February 1973 | Pages 127-142
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT73-A31239
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The compatibility of three strontium compounds (SrTiO3, Sr2TiO4, and SrO) with three superalloys (Haynes alloy No. 25, Hastelloy C, and Type 316 stainless steel) was studied at 900 and 1100°C for periods up to 10 000 h. The Sr2TiO4 was compatible under all test conditions, and only slight reaction occurred between SrTiO3 and the three superalloys. A 2- to 4-mil reaction zone developed between SrO and both Haynes alloy No. 25 and Hastelloy C at 900°C. At 1100°C the reaction was more extensive and also occurred with Type 316 stainless steel; however, the reaction rates became negligibly slow after 5000 h. For commercially produced Hastelloy C or C-276, the reaction with SrO appears to be related to the presence of one or more intermetallic phases. In laboratory heats containing very low silicon but relatively high carbon or in those containing very high silicon, these intermetallics did not form and no attack was observed. A reduction in the room-temperature mechanical properties of Haynes alloy No. 25, Hastelloy C, and Type 316 stainless steel was noted after heat treating at 900 or 1100°C. A further reduction in ductility was found in some of the samples exposed to SrO.