ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Human Factors, Instrumentation & Controls
Improving task performance, system reliability, system and personnel safety, efficiency, and effectiveness are the division's main objectives. Its major areas of interest include task design, procedures, training, instrument and control layout and placement, stress control, anthropometrics, psychological input, and motivation.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
H. C. Claiborne, W. W. Engle, Jr.
Nuclear Technology | Volume 13 | Number 2 | February 1972 | Pages 209-215
Technical Paper | Shielding | doi.org/10.13182/NT72-A31055
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Electronic components can be affected by the dose rate from gamma rays delivered during the first few shakes (10−8 sec/shake) of an exploding nuclear device. Determining such dose rates generally requires expensive time-dependent calculations. This paper demonstrates that relatively inexpensive steady-state transport calculations can be used to bracket time-dependent peak dose rates with meaningful upper and lower limits. The model configuration consisted of a sphere of air surrounded by a spherical annulus of concrete with an isotropic source of gamma rays from fissioning 235U located at the geometric center. Steady-state calculations were made with the discrete ordinates code ANISN and the time-dependent calculations with time-dependent ANISN (TDA). The upper limit dose rates were obtained by dividing the steady-state total dose by the pulse width of the device. This is equivalent to assuming that the uncollided and air-scattered fluxes arrive at the shield simultaneously. For a lower limit calculation, only the uncollided flux was considered incident on the shield. Calculations were made for a 120-cm-thick concrete shield for ranges of 500, 1000, and 5000 m and for step-function burst pulse widths of 1 through 8 shakes. The results from the steady-state calculations generally bracketed the peak time-dependent dose rates within an acceptably narrow band except for the 500-m range at the back end of the shield where the peak time-dependent dose rates were highest for all pulse widths. This apparent anomaly is explained on the basis of using a moving boundary condition in the time-dependent solution and the effect is shown to be of no consequence.