ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Thermal Hydraulics
The division provides a forum for focused technical dialogue on thermal hydraulic technology in the nuclear industry. Specifically, this will include heat transfer and fluid mechanics involved in the utilization of nuclear energy. It is intended to attract the highest quality of theoretical and experimental work to ANS, including research on basic phenomena and application to nuclear system design.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
T. Shimooke
Nuclear Technology | Volume 10 | Number 3 | March 1971 | Pages 257-272
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30958
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Various core performances, such as power and void distributions in a core, reactivity change, and shifts of control rods, are predicted for the JPDR-1 in a three-dimensional framework by means of the one-energy-group coarse-mesh approximation of the boiling water reactor (BWR) core. The predictions are checked in detail with experimental data that were accumulated by “the core-performance assessment experiments” done throughout the life of the JPDR-1 core. The data include y-probing data of the core at the exposure of each 1000 MWd/ton (approximately) core outlet void fractions measured directly by voidmeters, logbook records of the control rod patterns, heat-balance data for the precise core outputs, and others. In conclusion, the one-energy-group coarse-mesh approximation of the BWR is proved to be satisfactory for describing the global core performances of the JPDR-1 for burnup cases. The global power distributions can be calculated, e.g., with 4% standard deviation in the channel power sharing, and this is accurate enough to predict the core reactivity within 0.3% Δk/k error at 6000-MWd/ton exposure. The observed discrepancy, 0.9% Δk/k in the core reactivity at 6000-MWd/ton exposure (i.e., 10 to 15% error of the burnup change of reactivity), is discussed, with the final suggestion that the local power and exposure distribution in a core should be studied first, among others, for better achievement of the global core description.