ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Space: The new frontier of radiation controls
In commercial nuclear power, there has always been a deliberate tension between the regulator and the utility owner. The regulator fundamentally exists to protect the worker, and the utility, to make a profit. It is a win-win balance.
From the U.S. nuclear industry has emerged a brilliantly successful occupational nuclear safety record—largely the result of an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) process that has driven exposure rates down to what only a decade ago would have been considered unthinkable. In the U.S. nuclear industry, the system has accomplished an excellent, nearly seamless process that succeeds to the benefit of both employee and utility owner.
W. R. Waltz, J. F. Walter
Nuclear Technology | Volume 10 | Number 2 | February 1971 | Pages 160-167
Technical Paper and Note | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30923
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Comparisons of calculation and experiment have been performed to test the adequacy of fewgroup subcritical diffusion theory in predicting neutron detector response induced from material changes in a subcritical water-moderated reactor. In many operations involving material changes in a subcritical reactor, it is desired to monitor changes in the multiplication factor (Keff) of the system to ensure the safety of an operation by avoiding an accidental close approach to criticality. This monitoring procedure is accomplished by the introduction of artificial neutron sources to the system and by the proper interpretation of changes in neutron detector readings in terms of Keff. Because of the rather complicated involvement of the source-core-detector system, proper interpretation of detector response observed during these operations can only be achieved by the availability to predict detector response obtained from an accurate calculational model. Comparisons of calculation to experiment show that diffusion theory may be used successfully for these purposes; however, certain limitations of the model must be recognized and avoided. The breakdown of the calculational model in certain cases can be related ultimately to the inability of few-group diffusion theory to predict the absolute magnitude of detector flux for large distances through a water (or metal-water) shield. This inability can result in inaccuracies in predicted count rate response when applied to a specific source-core-detector arrangement with the characteristic that a given material change results in gross changes in the axial flux distribution. These effects can be overcome by the suitable positioning of the neutron source and detector relative to the subcritical assembly.
