ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Operations & Power
Members focus on the dissemination of knowledge and information in the area of power reactors with particular application to the production of electric power and process heat. The division sponsors meetings on the coverage of applied nuclear science and engineering as related to power plants, non-power reactors, and other nuclear facilities. It encourages and assists with the dissemination of knowledge pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of nuclear facilities through professional staff development, information exchange, and supporting the generation of viable solutions to current issues.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
2024: The Year in Nuclear—April through June
Another calendar year has passed. Before heading too far into 2025, let’s look back at what happened in 2024 in the nuclear community. In today's post, compiled from Nuclear News and Nuclear Newswire are what we feel are the top nuclear news stories from April through May 2024.
Stay tuned for the top stories from the rest of the past year.
Jan Leen Kloosterman, Evert E. Bende
Nuclear Technology | Volume 130 | Number 3 | June 2000 | Pages 227-241
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT00-A3090
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The reactor physics trends that can be observed when the moderator-to-fuel (MF) ratio of a mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel lattice increases from two (the standard value) to four are investigated. The influence of the MF ratio on the moderator void coefficient, the fuel temperature coefficient, the moderator temperature coefficient, the boron reactivity worth, the critical boron concentration, the mean neutron generation time, and the effective delayed neutron fraction has been investigated. Increasing the MF ratio to values larger than three gives a moderator void coefficient sufficiently large to recycle the plutonium at least four times. Also, the values of other parameters like the boron reactivity worth, the fuel temperature coefficient, the moderator temperature coefficient, and the mean neutron generation time improve with increasing MF ratio. The effective delayed neutron fraction is almost independent of the MF ratio. According to a point-kinetics model, the response of a MOX-fueled reactor with an MF ratio of four to a moderator temperature decrease is similar to that of a UO2-fueled reactor with an MF ratio of two.Scenario studies show that recycling plutonium four times in pressurized water reactors reduces the plutonium production by a factor of three compared with a reference once-through scenario, but the americium and curium production triples. If the plutonium remaining after recycling four times is disposed of, the radiotoxicity reduces by only a factor of two. This factor increases to a maximum of five if the plutonium can be eliminated in special burner reactors. Recycling of americium and curium is needed to reduce the radiotoxicity of the spent fuel to lower values. In general, the plutonium mass reduction increases and the minor actinide production decreases with increasing MF ratio of the MOX fuel.Enlarging the MF ratio can be achieved by increasing the rod pitch or by reducing the fuel pin diameter. In both cases, the economic penalty is about the same and is quite large.