ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Nano to begin drilling next week in Illinois
It’s been a good month for Nano Nuclear in the state of Illinois. On October 7, the Office of Governor J.B. Pritzker announced that the company would be awarded $6.8 million from the Reimagining Energy and Vehicles in Illinois Act to help fund the development of its new regional research and development facility in the Chicago suburb of Oak Brook.
D. J. Hill, W. D. Rankin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 11 | Number 2 | June 1971 | Pages 175-184
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30882
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Radiation data calculated by the discrete-ordinates technique is compared with experimentally determined information measured on the PAX intermediate spectrum reactor which is neu-tronically similar to the NERVA nuclear rocket. The information compared consists of the neutron dose rate, photon dose rate, fast neutron flux (measured with 238 U and sulfur detectors), and thermal neutron flux (measured with bare- and cadmium-covered dysprosium detectors) data in the core and reflector of the reactor. The calculated results displayed the same shape as the experimental data for all detectors and, with the exception of the bare dysprosium data in the core and the sulfur data, the calculated results had the same magnitude as the experimental results within the limits of experimental accuracies.