ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
2025 annual assessments out for U.S. reactors
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has released its 2025 annual performance assessments of the country’s 95 operating commercial nuclear reactors. And of the 95 reactors, all but five earned the highest marks.
Nuclear power plant assessments can fall under one of five categories: Licensee Response, Regulatory Response, Degraded Cornerstone, Degraded Performance, and Unacceptable Performance. Ninety reactors fell under Licensee Response, the highest performance category in safety and security. Plants that achieve this level of performance are subject to a Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) baseline inspection.
D. J. Hill, W. D. Rankin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 11 | Number 2 | June 1971 | Pages 175-184
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30882
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Radiation data calculated by the discrete-ordinates technique is compared with experimentally determined information measured on the PAX intermediate spectrum reactor which is neu-tronically similar to the NERVA nuclear rocket. The information compared consists of the neutron dose rate, photon dose rate, fast neutron flux (measured with 238 U and sulfur detectors), and thermal neutron flux (measured with bare- and cadmium-covered dysprosium detectors) data in the core and reflector of the reactor. The calculated results displayed the same shape as the experimental data for all detectors and, with the exception of the bare dysprosium data in the core and the sulfur data, the calculated results had the same magnitude as the experimental results within the limits of experimental accuracies.