ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Accelerator Applications
The division was organized to promote the advancement of knowledge of the use of particle accelerator technologies for nuclear and other applications. It focuses on production of neutrons and other particles, utilization of these particles for scientific or industrial purposes, such as the production or destruction of radionuclides significant to energy, medicine, defense or other endeavors, as well as imaging and diagnostics.
Meeting Spotlight
Utility Working Conference and Vendor Technology Expo (UWC 2024)
August 4–7, 2024
Marco Island, FL|JW Marriott Marco Island
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Vogtle-3 shuts down for valve issue
One of the new Vogtle units in Georgia was shut down unexpectedly on Monday last week for a valve issue that has since been investigated and repaired. According to multiple local news outlets, Georgia Power reported on July 17 that Unit 3 was back in service.
Southern Company spokesperson Jacob Hawkins confirmed that Vogtle-3 went off line at 9:25 p.m. local time on July 8 “due to lowering water levels in the steam generators caused by a valve issue on one of the three main feedwater pumps.”
Hiroaki Taniuchi, Fumio Matsuda
Nuclear Technology | Volume 127 | Number 1 | July 1999 | Pages 88-101
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste Management and Disposal | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A2986
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To clarify the effect of each assumption in a shielding analysis of a spent-fuel package to reduce the safety margin, the measured and calculated dose rates around a package are compared. Neutron and gamma-ray dose rates were measured at many points around a TN-12/2 transport package loaded with 1.5-yr-cooled spent fuel using an ionization chamber and a rem counter. Calculations were made using the SAS4M and MCNP codes based on detailed package and fuel assembly information, and the calculated and measured results were then compared. For the sides of the package, the discrepancy between the measured and calculated gamma-ray dose rates is within 50% except at both ends. There are discrepancies of a factor of 2 or 3 in the results for both end surfaces. In the top region, the calculated gamma-ray dose rates overestimate the measured ones by a factor of 2. In the bottom area, the discrepancy is within 40%. With respect to neutron dose rate, SAS4M and MCNP produce different results. On the sides, the SAS4M calculation overestimates the measured dose rates by a factor of 2 at the surface and 1.7 at 1 m from the surface; MCNP also overestimates, but the factor is lower. At the top, the overestimation is much larger at the surface. At the bottom, there is good agreement.The causes of the differences between measurements and calculation using data from a safety analysis report are discussed. One of the major reasons for the difference is that the calculation model uses the minimum values required for thickness and density that were used in the safety analyses to obtain conservative results. The angular dependence of the detector response and the effective center of the actual detector also affect the surface neutron dose rate values obtained by measurement. In addition, the burnup profile of the spent fuels affects not only the neutron dose rate but also the gamma-ray dose rate at both ends of a package. A more detailed investigation of the 60Co source is necessary for future work.