ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Isotopes & Radiation
Members are devoted to applying nuclear science and engineering technologies involving isotopes, radiation applications, and associated equipment in scientific research, development, and industrial processes. Their interests lie primarily in education, industrial uses, biology, medicine, and health physics. Division committees include Analytical Applications of Isotopes and Radiation, Biology and Medicine, Radiation Applications, Radiation Sources and Detection, and Thermal Power Sources.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
John M. Sorensen, Nicholas G. Trikouros
Nuclear Technology | Volume 121 | Number 3 | March 1998 | Pages 313-323
Technical Paper | RETRAN | doi.org/10.13182/NT98-A2843
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Core shroud cracking has been observed in several boiling water reactors (BWRs) since 1993. A current U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission concern is the response of a cracked core shroud to loads resulting from the main steam-line-break loss-of-coolant accident (MSLOCA). Core shroud loads and responses have been calculated by GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUNC) for the Oyster Creek BWR/2 using the RELAP5 computer code. The objectives of the RETRAN-02 analysis performed by S. Levy Incorporated were to assess the capability of RETRAN-02 to simulate an MSLOCA and to obtain an independent validation of the GPUNC results.A main steam-line break will result in rapid depressurization of the steam dome and an upward pressure load over the shroud head. This upward force has the potential to cause separation and displacement of the shroud head if the shroud head contains a 360-deg through-wall flaw.The key parameters and phenomena affecting the core shroud head pressure differential following the initiation of the MSLOCA are critical flow through the vessel side of the steam-line break; pressure wave dynamics in the steam lines; depressurization rate of the vessel steam dome; flow inertia and pressure drop of the steam dryers, steam separators, and standpipes; and flashing of saturated liquid in the upper plenum and reactor core.The key parameters and phenomena affecting the core shroud head lift are the core shroud head mass above the cracked weld, the core shroud head projected area, and the characteristics of the shroud weld crack leakage flow path from the core bypass to the vessel downcomer annulus.Comparison of RELAP5 and RETRAN-02 calculation results shows good agreement for the transient core shroud head pressure drop and lift predictions by the two methods. An important element in simulating this rapid transient, for both RELAP5 and RETRAN-02, is the ability to calculate the shroud head loading and lift through the use of control block elements and to directly couple the effect of flow through the shroud weld crack leakage flow path to the upper plenum thermal hydraulics.