ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Swiss nuclear power and the case for long-term operation
Designed for 40 years but built to last far longer, Switzerland’s nuclear power plants have all entered long-term operation. Yet age alone says little about safety or performance. Through continuous upgrades, strict regulatory oversight, and extensive aging management, the country’s reactors are being prepared for decades of continued operation, in line with international practice.
H. B. Rosenthal, E. A. Szymkowiak, C. H. George
Nuclear Technology | Volume 6 | Number 3 | March 1969 | Pages 191-198
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28305
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An experiment was performed to study the dynamic control of a reactor by hydrogen transport and to demonstrate its load-following capabilities. The system is based on the mass transport of hydrogen between two ZrHX beds—one UO2 fueled, the other unfueled. The in-core hydrogen concentration controls the reactivity, and the resulting changes in reactor flux control the heat input into the in-core UO2-fueled bed. In turn, the in-core hydrogen concentration is controlled by changes in temperature differences between the in-core and out-of-core beds. Within analytical design constraints set by experimental and safety requirements, calculated ranges of parameters established design specifications. Preliminary validation measurements included reactor stability and temperature coefficient, experimental system stability and temperature coefficient, and in-core hydrogen worth. Comparison showed that hydrogen mass transport contributed 73% of the effectiveness of hydrogen reactivity control while temperature contributed only 27%. All experimental transient responses to step changes in thermal load exhibited analytically predicted damped oscillatory behavior. Reactor startup, shutdown, and response to reactivity changes were demonstrated. This experiment verified that hydrogen reactivity control, a mechanically passive device, is an effective, self-regulating mechanism for controlling a nuclear reactor.