ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Long-term strategy calls for up to 10 new reactors in Canada
Canada has launched a Nuclear Energy Strategy, a long-term vision of its nuclear power potential that includes plans to deploy up to 10 new large-scale reactors in the country by 2040.
The June 22 announcement, along with ongoing projects at Darlington and Bruce Power, further confirm Canada's ambitions to expand its nuclear power presence not just domestically but also abroad. Four pillars stand at the heart of the country’s Nuclear Energy Strategy: new nuclear builds in Canada, maintaining its status as a top nuclear supplier and exporter, expanding uranium production, and continuing nuclear fission and fusion innovations.
R. T. Allen, R. E. Duff
Nuclear Technology | Volume 6 | Number 6 | June 1969 | Pages 567-572
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28286
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Finite difference techniques for the solution of the motion of an elastic-plastic solid are used to investigate the effect of rock strength and the cavity gas properties on the cavity size formed by a nuclear explosion. The material description includes the effect of pressure and temperature on the yield surface and the change of material description in the solid, liquid, and vapor phases. The results presented indicate a strong dependence of cavity size on the rock strength and a considerably lower sensitivity to the ideal gas coefficient, γ, assumed for the cavity gas. The results suggest that the cavity sizes observed in nuclear field tests can be better correlated with calculations by assuming strength parameters considerably lower than observed in laboratory tests on competent rock samples.