ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Highlights from the 2025 ANS State of the Nuclear Workforce survey
Last year was marked by a general air of excitement across the nuclear sector. From conference halls to board rooms, momentum manifested in numerous new project announcements, robust federal support, and high-aiming ambitions.
This mood was captured by the 2025 ANS State of the Nuclear Workforce survey, which was conducted from October 1–14. In isolation, the results of this year’s survey are promising; but when compared with the 2024 survey, the story is even clearer, with optimism up almost across the board and renewed attention in the industry’s most critical sectors.
Harold M. Busey
Nuclear Technology | Volume 6 | Number 6 | June 1969 | Pages 533-543
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28282
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Floating entire nuclear power plants on water to minimize stresses and differential deflections resulting from seismic shock may permit their construction offshore, in bays or rivers, and close to populated load centers. The use of open water as an exclusion area, access to cooling water immediately around the station, availability of water transportation, and assurance of safety during earthquakes largely offset the added cost of floating the station and transmitting power to shore. Floating all components on a captive barge decouples a nuclear power plant from seismic disturbance, and no damage will occur within the station during not only an earthquake but any credible environmental condition. Because there is no relative movement of station components, there can be no loss of primary coolant, no fuel melting, no damage to the containment, and consequently, no release of fission products. Several designs have been considered. Only present methods of construction were used in the plans for a preferred design of a 1000-MW(e) station. To develop costs for evaluation, a design site was selected in the shallow water 2750 ft offshore near Los Angeles, where the Bolsa Island nuclear plant was being considered.