ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC session focuses on interagency collaboration
Attendees at last week’s 2026 Regulatory Information Conference, hosted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, saw extensive discussion of new reactor technologies, uprates, fusion, multiunit deployments, supply chain, and much more.
With the industry in a state of rapid evolution, there was much to discuss. Connected to all these topics was one central theme: the ongoing changes at the NRC. With massively shortened timelines, the ADVANCE Act and Executive Order 14300, and new interagency collaboration and authorization pathways in mind, speakers spent much of the RIC exploring what the road ahead looks like for the NRC.
S. M. Zivi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 5 | Number 2 | August 1968 | Pages 53-54
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT68-A27949
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In a loss-of-coolant accident in which gross melting of the core is not prevented, a melt-through of the bottom of the containment vessel may be averted by an unenriched UO2 barrier beneath the reactor vessel. Such a barrier would melt only very slowly because the fuel mass from the core would tend to float on top of the barrier, and the melting front in the barrier could advance only as a result of heat conducted through the previously melted part of the barrier. This gives rise to a melting front advance which varies as mt½, where m is a constant determined by the material properties. A calculation indicates that the rate of penetration of the melting front is more than an order of magnitude less if the core mass floats on the barrier, than if the core mass is more dense than the barrier, and tends to displace it and sink to the melting interface.