ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
A wave of new U.S.-U.K. deals ahead of Trump’s state visit
President Trump will arrive in the United Kingdom this week for a state visit that promises to include the usual pomp and ceremony alongside the signing of a landmark new agreement on U.S.-U.K. nuclear collaboration.
R. Dierckx, A. Marchal, A. van Wauwe
Nuclear Technology | Volume 3 | Number 9 | September 1967 | Pages 532-539
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT67-A27934
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The use of a direct reactivity meter for control-rod calibration was studied. The reactor model was simplified by reducing the number of delayed-neutron and photoneutron groups from 15 to 6, and by putting dn/dt equal to zero, without greatly affecting the accuracy of the reactivity measurements. The influence of errors in the knowledge of the parameters of the remaining six delayed-neutron groups was studied. Measurements were made on two reactors: ECO, a cold reactor; and ISPRA-I, a reactor with a strong long-lived photoneutron source. The measurements performed with the direct reactivity meter were compared to normal rod-drop measurement techniques and period measurement techniques, and were found to agree in general to ±2%. The long-lived source term, which depends on the reactor operation history, was found to a precision of better than ±1%.