ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Isotopes & Radiation
Members are devoted to applying nuclear science and engineering technologies involving isotopes, radiation applications, and associated equipment in scientific research, development, and industrial processes. Their interests lie primarily in education, industrial uses, biology, medicine, and health physics. Division committees include Analytical Applications of Isotopes and Radiation, Biology and Medicine, Radiation Applications, Radiation Sources and Detection, and Thermal Power Sources.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Frigyes Reisch, Torsten Spanne
Nuclear Technology | Volume 3 | Number 10 | October 1967 | Pages 590-598
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT67-A27918
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The quantitative influence of the void and Doppler coefficients on the dynamics of the Boiling Heavy-Water Reactor (BHWR) under different operating conditions has been examined extensively. Owing to the difficulty of calculating these coefficients exactly and their great influence on the dynamic behavior of the self-controlled reactor, these parameters have been studied over a wide range. The studies also improve understanding of the transient behavior of the BHWR concept. It has been found that undamped oscillations can arise with special combinations of the reactivity coefficients. In the nonlinear dynamic model used, the void reactivity contribution comes from the changes of the exit void and the subcooling. The oscillations induced by the reactivity feedbacks have different dampings and frequencies of ≈0.003 or ≈0.03 cps, depending on the sign and the magnitude of the void reactivity coefficients. The transient neutron flux responses to step reactivity perturbations that have the first peak (limited by the fuel Doppler coefficient) as the largest overshoot or that are strongly damped oscillations lie in a well definable area in the exit void and subcooling reactivity coefficient coordinate system. Disturbances introduced by reactivity variation and main steam-valve opening are discussed. The transient responses calculated were those of the neutron flux, reactivity, pressure, moderator temperature, exit void, average void, subcooling, and temperatures of the boiler and superheater fuel.