ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Space: The new frontier of radiation controls
In commercial nuclear power, there has always been a deliberate tension between the regulator and the utility owner. The regulator fundamentally exists to protect the worker, and the utility, to make a profit. It is a win-win balance.
From the U.S. nuclear industry has emerged a brilliantly successful occupational nuclear safety record—largely the result of an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) process that has driven exposure rates down to what only a decade ago would have been considered unthinkable. In the U.S. nuclear industry, the system has accomplished an excellent, nearly seamless process that succeeds to the benefit of both employee and utility owner.
Raphael S. Daniels
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 2 | October 1989 | Pages 553-555
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Health Physics and Environmental Release / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27752
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Due to elevated radiation exposure rates in the Three Mile Island (TMI) Unit 2 reactor building (RB) in the summer of 1982 (2 yr after the first entry), two conclusions were abundantly clear: (a) Planned activities within the RB would entail an excessive expenditure of person-rem, which is not consistent with the concept of as low as reasonably achievable, and (b) planned activities could not be accomplished by the existing work force at TMI without exceeding quarterly and annual dose limits. Based on the need to limit person-rem exposure and the constraint of financial resources, a comprehensive dose reduction program was in order. Such a dose reduction program would require various stages beginning with those actions that could be quickly implemented. Those initial actions would be followed by near-term activities that could be implemented via technical planning data and equipment acquisition. After those activities were accomplished, dose rates would be reduced and new sources would be identified. Dose reduction is a continuing activity that must be addressed throughout the decontamination and recovery process. The task force developed a three-step approach toward dose reduction. Results of the dose reduction program are presented in chronological order and compared to predictions.