ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
2024: The Year in Nuclear—July through September
Another calendar year has passed. Before heading too far into 2025, let’s look back at what happened in 2024 in the nuclear community. In today's post, compiled from Nuclear News and Nuclear Newswire are what we feel are the top nuclear news stories from July through September 2024.
Stay tuned for the top stories from the rest of the past year.
Merril Eisenbud
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 2 | October 1989 | Pages 514-519
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Health Physics and Environmental Release / Radiation Biology and Environment | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27746
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Destruction of the core of Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) resulted in the release of large quantities of primary coolant into the reactor, auxiliary, and fuel handling buildings. Volatile fission products, mainly noble gases, with lesser amounts of radioiodines, escaped into the plant atmosphere and were discharged to the environment via the stack from the plant ventilation system. The contaminated water was retained within the buildings, from which no uncontrolled releases occurred. Radiation monitoring personnel from several government agencies and national laboratories were quickly assembled at TMI-2. The data they collected were analyzed by specialists from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; the national laboratories operated by the U.S. Department of Energy; the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. These efforts made it possible to develop estimates of the dose received by the maximally exposed individual and the collective dose received by the more than two million people who lived within 80.5 km from the plant. The collective dose estimates ranged from 28 to 35 person-Sv (2800 to 3500 person-rem). The maximum dose to any individual was estimated to be <1 mSv (100 mrem). Essentially all of the off-site collective dose was due to the release of ∼370 PBq (10 million Ci) of noble gases. In addition, <1.1 TBq (30 Ci) of 131I and 0.148 TBq (4 Ci) of 133I are estimated to have been released to the atmosphere, with small amounts of other radionuclides released to the Susquehanna River. When accepted risk coefficients are applied to the estimates of collective dose, it is concluded that no radiation-induced cancers would be expected to occur in the lifetime of the exposed population.