ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Andrew P. Hull
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 2 | October 1989 | Pages 383-394
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Health Physics and Environmental Release / Radiation Biology and Environment | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27728
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Although the advance planning for it was minimal by today’s standards, a large integrated federal and state environmental monitoring response was made to the Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident. In particular, major resources were committed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). They include the Brookhaven National Laboratory-based Radiological Assistance Program, the Atmospheric Release Advisory Capability, and the Aerial Measurements System, with backup personnel from other DOE national laboratories. Additional resources were provided by the Environmental Protection Agency. The monitoring effort included plume tracking, field environmental monitoring and sampling, sample analysis, and dose assessment. The ranges of the installed plant monitors having been exceeded, these data were important for establishing the nuclides and their quantities in the daily releases from the plant during the first few weeks after the accident. In particular, it was established that the continuing releases consisted almost entirely of radiogases, with very small quantities of radioiodines. The highest measured ground-level dose rate was 1.3 × 102 C/kg (50 mR/h) and the largest concentration of 131I <3.7 × 10−6 Bq/cm3 (<1 × 10−10 µCi/cm3). From DOE population dose assessment, the highest individual dose appears to have been <1 mSv/h (<100 mR/h) and the total population dose 20 person-Sv (∼2000 person-rems). This largely ad hoc response became the basic model for today’s Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Program, which would be put into operation should a major accident occur at a U.S. nuclear facility.