ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Marzano sworn in as NRC commissioner
Marzano
Matthew Marzano became the newest member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission when he was officially sworn into office by chair Christopher Hanson this week.
The nuclear engineer and former reactor operator was confirmed last month in a 50–45 vote in the U.S. Senate. Last July, President Biden nominated Marzano to serve on the commission, which is tasked with formulating policies, developing regulations, issuing orders, and resolving legal matters.
Marzano’s term expires June 30, 2028.
Dale J. Merchant
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 4 | December 1989 | Pages 1099-1105
Late Paper | TMI-2: Decontamination and Waste Management / Nuclear Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27700
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
External and internal radiation exposures to workers involved in the Three Mile Island Unit 2 recovery effort are reviewed. The 1979 accident left the plant with several areas with radiation environments that would not allow personnel entries for more than a few minutes without reaching the federal radiation limits. The recovery necessitated many unique tasks never before attempted in the U.S. commercial nuclear industry. Total commitment to the as-low-as-reasonablyachievable principle has helped keep individual and collective exposures acceptably low while allowing the recovery to proceed expeditiously. Since the initial worker actions to stabilize the plant and assess accident damage during 1979, there have been no individual exposures to radiation in excess of regulatory limits. Every individual annual dose since 1980 has been <0.04 Sv (4 rem), and the average annual worker dose has been comparable with the U.S. industry average. The annual collective exposures have been increasing since the initial plant stabilization. The relatively low collective doses from 1980 to 1983 reflect the technical planning and engineering phase of the recovery while conducting initial decontamination and dose reduction measures. Preliminary reactor vessel preparations and actual defueling commenced in 1984 and 1985. The collective doses in 1986 and 1987 correspond to the full-scale defueling and decontamination activities. The actual cumulative occupational dose through August 1988 was ∼53 person-Sv (5300 person-rem), and it is anticipated that <70 person-Sv (7000 personrem) will have been expended for the recovery. These collective doses are within the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s original estimate of 30 to 80 person-Sv (3000 to 8000 person-rem) and compare to the average collective dose for commercial nuclear power plants in the United States over the same time period.