ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
First astatine-labeled compound shipped in the U.S.
The Department of Energy’s National Isotope Development Center (NIDC) on March 31 announced the successful long-distance shipment in the United States of a biologically active compound labeled with the medical radioisotope astatine-211 (At-211). Because previous shipments have included only the “bare” isotope, the NIDC has described the development as “unleashing medical innovation.”
Clay M. Davis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 4 | December 1989 | Pages 778-785
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Decontamination and Waste Management / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27671
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The March 28, 1979, loss-of-coolant accident at Three Mile Island Unit 2 resulted in the exposure of ∼3000 m2 of reactor building (RB) internal concrete surfaces to both liquid- and vapor-borne contaminants. The period of contact between these surfaces and aqueous solutions of mixed fission products ranged from a few days to several years. At the completion of gross decontamination of the accessible elevations of the RB in 1982 by water flushing, high-pressure spraying, strippable coating application, and hands-on wiping, dose rates remained above expected levels. Surveys and limited surface sampling indicated that contaminants had penetrated the protective coatings on the structural concrete, creating a substantial fixed source. To assess the depth of contaminant penetration into the concrete, a sampling program was conducted in September 1983. Based on the results of this program, it was determined that where coatings were intact, penetration past the matrix of the coating was insignificant. Where the coatings had been damaged prior to the accident, however, penetrations into the concrete were observed up to 20 mm. Subsequent modeling using the ISOSHLD II code using these values indicated that between 23 and 40% of the 1983 observed dose rates could be attributed to this source. Coatings removal tests conducted on the samples demonstrated that removal of the coatings could result in the removal of between 50 and 98% of the activity. Subsequent to this work, coatings and concrete removal on the accessible upper elevations of the RB resulted in dose reductions of 15 to 38%. These data, and that of subsequent work in the RB basement, indicate that protective coatings applied to structural concrete substantially reduce the degree to which the substrate will be penetrated by aqueous contaminant solutions. Relative to the ability to successfully remove absorbed contamination, the coating matrix containing the major fraction of the radionuclide load may be removed with less aggressive effort than that required to remove a potentially larger volume of contaminated concrete.