ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Fusion office bill introduced in line with DOE reorganization plan
Cornyn
Padilla
Sens. Alex Padilla (D., Calif.) and John Cornyn (R., Texas) have introduced bipartisan legislation to formally establish the Office of Fusion at the Department of Energy. This move seeks to codify one of the many changes put forward by the recent internal reorganization plan for offices at the DOE.
Companion legislation has been introduced in the House of Representatives by Reps. Don Beyer (D., Va.) and Jay Obernolte (R., Calif.), who are cochairs of the House Fusion Energy Caucus.
Details: According to Obernolte, “Congress must provide clear direction and a coordinated federal strategy to move fusion from the lab to the grid, and this legislation does exactly that.”
Sidney Langer, M. L. Russell, Douglas W. Akers
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 1 | August 1989 | Pages 196-204
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Materials Behavior / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27647
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The release of fission products from the Three Mile Island Unit 2 plant during and following the accident was low and consisted almost entirely of noble gases and an estimated 15 Ci of 131 I. Such a small iodine release is surprising considering that 52% of the core inventory of radiocesium and 40% of the radioiodine were released from the reactor core. Significant releases of fission products to the plant systems commenced at 138 min following failure of the fuel rods. The primary pathway to the environment was through the letdown/makeup purification system to the auxiliary building plant stack. The large releases (40 to 50%) of noble gases, cesium, and iodine to the reactor building were contained within the building for 1 yr until the noble gases were released under controlled conditions.