ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Operations & Power
Members focus on the dissemination of knowledge and information in the area of power reactors with particular application to the production of electric power and process heat. The division sponsors meetings on the coverage of applied nuclear science and engineering as related to power plants, non-power reactors, and other nuclear facilities. It encourages and assists with the dissemination of knowledge pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of nuclear facilities through professional staff development, information exchange, and supporting the generation of viable solutions to current issues.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Marzano sworn in as NRC commissioner
Marzano
Matthew Marzano became the newest member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission when he was officially sworn into office by chair Christopher Hanson this week.
The nuclear engineer and former reactor operator was confirmed last month in a 50–45 vote in the U.S. Senate. Last July, President Biden nominated Marzano to serve on the commission, which is tasked with formulating policies, developing regulations, issuing orders, and resolving legal matters.
Marzano’s term expires June 30, 2028.
Robert V. Strain, Lawrence A. Neimark, John E. Sanecki
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 1 | August 1989 | Pages 187-190
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Materials Behavior / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27645
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Detailed microstructural and microchemical examinations of samples of debris extracted from the lower plenum region of the Three Mile Island Unit 2 reactor were performed using optical and electron-beam instrument microscopy. Results of this study indicate that this material was a previously molten ceramic consisting primarily of UO2 and ZrO2 with smaller amounts of iron, chromium, nickel, and aluminum present also as oxides. The microstructures of the samples were typical of cast multicomponent materials, i.e., rounded grains with additional phases in the grain boundaries. In most cases, the primary grains appeared to be singlephase material as would be expected if a UO2-ZrO2 solid solution were rapidly cooled from the liquid state. However, portions of these grains showed indications of segregation into two distinct phases, and in some areas the whole grains were segregated into two phases. The segregated grains are indicative of a slower cooling rate for part of the material. In addition to the primary urania-zirconia grains, there were large areas of eutectic structure in some of the samples. One of the phases in the eutectic structure consisted of iron and chromium with small amounts of aluminum and nickel, all as oxides. This material was also present in many grain boundaries in the primary grain structure. The grain boundary phase could have a solidus temperature as low as ∼1600K. This low melting point compared to the bulk of the material has led to speculation that the grain boundaries may have remained liquid after the grains themselves had solidified. This would allow the material to flow like wet sand through the structure above the lower plenum at temperatures near or possibly below the melting point of stainless steel (1670 K). At these temperatures, the moving mass would not have severely melted the stainless steel structure near the bottom of the vessel.