ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Paul David Bottomley, Michel Coquerelle
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 1 | August 1989 | Pages 120-136
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Materials Behavior / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27642
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Samples of the bores obtained from the melted core of the Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) reactor were investigated as part of the TMI-2 accident evaluation program. The samples included fuel rod segments, control rod cladding, melted core rocks, and powder debris from various bores into the reactor core. The microstructure of the specimens was determined by examination and analysis of surface and cross section by means of electro-optical techniques (including energy-dispersive X-ray scanning electron microscopy and microprobe analysis). Gamma spectroscopy and a fission product release study were also performed on the specimens. The melted core rock specimens obtained from the G12 bores were mostly porous ceramic mixtures of uranium and zirconium oxides in the form of a fine eutectic of UO2- and ZrO2-rich phases and oxidized ferrous material derived from the stainless steel components. The rock specimens showed variations in porosity and ferrous content but a similar UO2-ZrO2 eutectic structure. Fission product analysis of the fuel segments and rocks indicated relatively low levels of activity due to fission products such as I37Cs, 106Ru, I54Eu, and fuel irradiation products. No volatile 129I was detected, but most other products displayed some retention in the melted core samples. According to whether eutectics were formed between Zr(O) and UO2 or ZrO2 and UO2 (i.e., the oxygen potential in the core), reference to the phase diagrams suggests temperatures of 2173 to 2873 K (1900 to 2600°C) for substantial periods and even up to 3073 K (2800°C) (U02 melting point) for the completely melted core specimens. Agglomerate specimens indicate lower temperatures [∼1673 K (1400°C), the melting point of stainless steel] and shorter excursion times at the edge of the melt zone. The remaining fuel rod segments showed very little change, indicating that the severe overheating is localized to the central part of the reactor pile.