ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Thermal Hydraulics
The division provides a forum for focused technical dialogue on thermal hydraulic technology in the nuclear industry. Specifically, this will include heat transfer and fluid mechanics involved in the utilization of nuclear energy. It is intended to attract the highest quality of theoretical and experimental work to ANS, including research on basic phenomena and application to nuclear system design.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Candidates for leadership provide statements: ANS Board of Directors
With the annual ANS election right around the corner, American Nuclear Society members will be going to the polls to vote for a vice president/president-elect, treasurer, and members-at-large for the Board of Directors. In January, Nuclear News published statements from candidates for vice president/president-elect and treasurer. This month, we are featuring statements from each nominee for the Board of Directors.
Joseph C. Stachew
Nuclear Technology | Volume 4 | Number 4 | April 1968 | Pages 206-216
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT68-A26318
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The uranium and plutonium isotopic distributions of 45 irradiated fuel rods of natural uranium dioxide are compared to theoretical predictions made using three-dimensional P-1 neutron diffusion techniques. The calculations are different in that normalization to experimental results is made only by use of the total core energy output and measured critical rod-bank heights. This is in contrast to normalizing each individual fuel-rod burnup to the experimental value and then investigating resultant isotopic distributions in the rod. The comparison indicates good agreement but identifies the need for a spatial spectrum variation of the 238U epithermal resonance absorption cross section and improved time -dependence of the 238U and 239Pu cross sections.