ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
2025 annual assessments out for U.S. reactors
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has released its 2025 annual performance assessments of the country’s 95 operating commercial nuclear reactors. And of the 95 reactors, all but five earned the highest marks.
Nuclear power plant assessments can fall under one of five categories: Licensee Response, Regulatory Response, Degraded Cornerstone, Degraded Performance, and Unacceptable Performance. Ninety reactors fell under Licensee Response, the highest performance category in safety and security. Plants that achieve this level of performance are subject to a Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) baseline inspection.
Gert Sdouz, Sigurdur J. Dagbjartsson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 57 | Number 3 | June 1982 | Pages 331-342
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A26302
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analytical study was conducted to quantify the azimuthal temperature variations that might occur around a light water reactor nuclear fuel rod under steady-state and loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) blowdown conditions. Significant azimuthal temperature variations on the cladding surface will result in a reduction of the total circumferential elongation of the cladding deforming in the alpha phase of the Zircaloy and thus a reduction in coolant channel blockage. Power skewing across the fuel rod and off-center location of the fuel pellet within the cladding are considered as possible causes for an asymmetrical temperature distribution on the cladding. The conclusions reached were as follows. 1. Off-center location of a fuel pellet produces significant azimuthal temperature variations in the fuel during steady-state operation and small circumferential temperature differences in the cladding during the LOCA blowdown. 2. Highly localized small strains-to-failure in Zircaloy out-of-pile ballooning experiments may not be representative of in-pile results where cladding temperatures are calculated to be relatively uniform.