ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Robotics & Remote Systems
The Mission of the Robotics and Remote Systems Division is to promote the development and application of immersive simulation, robotics, and remote systems for hazardous environments for the purpose of reducing hazardous exposure to individuals, reducing environmental hazards and reducing the cost of performing work.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Candidates for leadership provide statements: ANS Board of Directors
With the annual ANS election right around the corner, American Nuclear Society members will be going to the polls to vote for a vice president/president-elect, treasurer, and members-at-large for the Board of Directors. In January, Nuclear News published statements from candidates for vice president/president-elect and treasurer. This month, we are featuring statements from each nominee for the Board of Directors.
Robert E. Rothe, Donald L. Alvarez, Harold E. Clark
Nuclear Technology | Volume 25 | Number 3 | March 1975 | Pages 502-516
Technical Paper | Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A24388
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Nuclear safety engineers must evaluate the criticality potential of a variety of plant problems. Many of these involve an essentially unreflected system containing uranium solution and a fixed nuclear poison. Measured critical parameters for such a system at solution concentrations of 52.2- and 141.5-g U/liter, together with those reported previously at 450.8-g U/liter, provide the engineer information over a wide range of concentrations normally encountered in industrial applications. The uranium was enriched to 93.24 wt% 235U. The fixed poison was 1.02 wt% natural boron alloyed in stainless-steel plates. Critical solution heights were measured for various numbers of nearly uniformly spaced vertical plates within the 106.6-cm-diam experimental tank. The simplest cases studied involved no poison, resulting in low critical heights. As plates were added, the critical height increased until a sufficient number were present that even an infinitely tall tank would have been subcritical. The actual finite plate height permitted a third type of experimental result: the critical parameters of an unpoisoned uranium solution slab on top of a highly poisoned solution region. Experimental data at all three concentrations compared with results from Monte Carlo and neutron transport computer codes are found to predict critical heights consistently in excess of measured values. A nuclear safety engineer may safely apply these calculational methods to similar plant situations provided an ∼20% reduction in either the solution height or plate spacing— whichever is appropriate—is made to account for the theory/experiment difference. Boron-containing plates are compared with borosilicate glass Raschig rings as fixed nuclear poisons for large-volume solution storage. Neither is clearly superior to the other considering the poison volume percent required for criticality. Nuclear safety engineers may safely apply these experimental poison plate data to standard ringpoisoned systems involving a high-concentration uranium solution provided a 2% increase in the boron density is made to account for uncertainties in the comparison.