ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Kun Mo, Hsiao-Ming Tung, Xiang Chen, Yang Zhao, Jon Hansen, James F. Stubbins
Nuclear Technology | Volume 183 | Number 3 | September 2013 | Pages 455-463
Technical Paper | Materials for Nuclear Systems | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-A19433
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Both Alloy 617 and Alloy 230 have been considered the most promising structural materials for the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR). In this study, mechanical properties of both alloys were examined by performing tensile tests at three different strain rates and at temperatures up to 1000°C. This range covers time-dependent (plasticity) to time-independent (creep) deformations. Strain-rate sensitivity analysis for each alloy was conducted in order to approximate the long-term flow stresses. The strain-rate sensitivities for the 0.2% flow stress were found to be temperature independent (m [approximate] 0) at temperatures ranging from room temperature to 700°C due to dynamic strain aging. At elevated temperatures (800°C to 1000°C), the strain-rate sensitivity significantly increased (m > 0.1). Compared to Alloy 617, Alloy 230 displayed higher strain-rate sensitivities at high temperatures. This leads to lower estimated long-term flow stresses. Results of this analysis were used to evaluate the current American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) allowable design limits for each alloy. The study showed that the allowable design stresses in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for either alloy do not provide adequate long-term degradation estimation. Nevertheless, rupture stresses for Alloy 617, developed in the ASME code case N-47-28, can generally satisfy the safety margins at 800°C and 1000°C estimated in the study following the strain-rate sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, additional material development studies might be required, since the design parameters for rupture stresses are constrained such that the current VHTR conceptual designs cannot satisfy the material limits.