ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
John M. Jamieson, Geoffrey G. Eichholz
Nuclear Technology | Volume 39 | Number 1 | June 1978 | Pages 95-100
Nuclear Safety Analysis | Energy Modeling and Forecasting / Analysis | doi.org/10.13182/NT78-A17011
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method for analyzing nuclear material for different fissile nuclides by cyclic activation has been developed and tested experimentally with samples of 235U and 239Pu, singly and in combination. The method of analysis is based on the differences in the abundances and half-lives of delayed neutron groups between the various fissile nuclides. The steady-state delayed neutron response to periodic activation is independent of activation cycle period at short periods, decreases exponentially with period at long periods, and has a break point, or knee, where the response changes from constant to exponential, or from one exponential to another, with greater slope for each characteristic emitter present. The activation cycle periods at which these break points occur, the slopes of the exponential fall-off or response with cycle period between break points, and the absolute magnitude of the response at any cycle period are all functions of the effective half-lives and abundances of the delayed neutron precursors activated, so, consequently, the characteristic delayed neutron response as a function of activation cycle period is different for the various fissile species. In the experiment, cyclic activation was accomplished by moving the samples containing fissile material cyclically through a thermal-neutron beam from the Georgia Tech Research Reactor, out of the beam and through a delayed neutron detector, and back through the beam, etc. The delayed neutron response was recorded at activation cycle periods ranging from 0.1 to 100 s for samples containing varying amounts of 235U and 239Pu. Deviations in the responses of the samples containing both 235U and 239Pu from the response of standards containing only 235U or 239Pu were determined to infer the 235U- to-239Pu ratio. After the ratio of the two fissile nuclides present was obtained, the delayed neutron response at short cycle periods was used to estimate the mass of each fissile nuclide present in the sample. For samples containing about a gram of fissile material, accuracies on the order of 2% for 235U and 4% for 239Pu could be obtained for 1.5-h experiment run times when the fissile nuclides were present in about equal portions. Accuracies were dependent on the 235U-to-239Pu ratio and on the total mass of fissile materials present.
