ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Space: The new frontier of radiation controls
In commercial nuclear power, there has always been a deliberate tension between the regulator and the utility owner. The regulator fundamentally exists to protect the worker, and the utility, to make a profit. It is a win-win balance.
From the U.S. nuclear industry has emerged a brilliantly successful occupational nuclear safety record—largely the result of an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) process that has driven exposure rates down to what only a decade ago would have been considered unthinkable. In the U.S. nuclear industry, the system has accomplished an excellent, nearly seamless process that succeeds to the benefit of both employee and utility owner.
John M. Jamieson, Geoffrey G. Eichholz
Nuclear Technology | Volume 39 | Number 1 | June 1978 | Pages 95-100
Nuclear Safety Analysis | Energy Modeling and Forecasting / Analysis | doi.org/10.13182/NT78-A17011
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method for analyzing nuclear material for different fissile nuclides by cyclic activation has been developed and tested experimentally with samples of 235U and 239Pu, singly and in combination. The method of analysis is based on the differences in the abundances and half-lives of delayed neutron groups between the various fissile nuclides. The steady-state delayed neutron response to periodic activation is independent of activation cycle period at short periods, decreases exponentially with period at long periods, and has a break point, or knee, where the response changes from constant to exponential, or from one exponential to another, with greater slope for each characteristic emitter present. The activation cycle periods at which these break points occur, the slopes of the exponential fall-off or response with cycle period between break points, and the absolute magnitude of the response at any cycle period are all functions of the effective half-lives and abundances of the delayed neutron precursors activated, so, consequently, the characteristic delayed neutron response as a function of activation cycle period is different for the various fissile species. In the experiment, cyclic activation was accomplished by moving the samples containing fissile material cyclically through a thermal-neutron beam from the Georgia Tech Research Reactor, out of the beam and through a delayed neutron detector, and back through the beam, etc. The delayed neutron response was recorded at activation cycle periods ranging from 0.1 to 100 s for samples containing varying amounts of 235U and 239Pu. Deviations in the responses of the samples containing both 235U and 239Pu from the response of standards containing only 235U or 239Pu were determined to infer the 235U- to-239Pu ratio. After the ratio of the two fissile nuclides present was obtained, the delayed neutron response at short cycle periods was used to estimate the mass of each fissile nuclide present in the sample. For samples containing about a gram of fissile material, accuracies on the order of 2% for 235U and 4% for 239Pu could be obtained for 1.5-h experiment run times when the fissile nuclides were present in about equal portions. Accuracies were dependent on the 235U-to-239Pu ratio and on the total mass of fissile materials present.
