ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Rainer Moormann, Klaus Hilpert
Nuclear Technology | Volume 94 | Number 1 | April 1991 | Pages 56-67
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT91-A16221
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An overview of high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTR) fission product chemistry and its influence on source terms in core heatup accidents is given. These accidents are risk-dominating for medium-sized HTRs and are characterized by maximum core temperatures of ∼2500°C (2773 K) and a late-starting, slowly proceeding fission product release from the fuel particles. In these accidents, the number of chemical reactions in the core and primary circuit is limited by the low oxygen potential and preferential release of metal from the fuel. The graphite in the core acts as a very powerful barrier to metallic fission products because of its chemisorption action. Cesium iodide (CsI) formation can reduce this sorptive retention for cesium when there is a high cesium burden on the graphite. This is not necessarily expected for small HTRs, which have much lower maximum accident temperatures (1600° C = 1873 K) and a much lower fractional release of fission products from coated particles. In the primary circuit, less efficient chemisorption of fission products on metals occurs. The fission product chemistry in the HTR reactor building is similar to that for other reactor types. Conservatisms in handling fission product chemistry in HTR safety analyses are identified. This leads to the conclusion that, especially for metallic fission products, a significant potential for reduction of the actual core heatup source terms exists. In modern medium-sized HTRs, these source terms are of the order of <1% of the core inventory for cesium, iodine, and noble gases and <0.1% for strontium. For small HTRs, these source terms remain several orders of magnitude smaller.