ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Bahram Nassersharif, James S. Peery, Evelyn M. Mullen, Stephen R. Behling
Nuclear Technology | Volume 94 | Number 1 | April 1991 | Pages 28-43
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT91-A16219
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This study evaluates two significantly different models of a Westinghouse 414 reactor system using the TRAC-PF1/MOD1 computer code for a small-break loss-of-coolant accident (SBLOCA). A coarse threedimensional model of the reactor vessel is developed. In the coarse model, three of the four reactor coolant loops are combined into one loop. A detailed three-dimensional model of the reactor vessel is also developed. In the detailed model, each of the four coolant loops is modeled separately. Both models are run to steady-state convergence until the calculated system parameters are in good agreement. In addition, the steady-state results of both models closely match operational parameters given in the final safety analysis report. From the self-consistent steady-state conditions, a 60-s transient calculation is performed with each model. The transient simulates a 4-in. SBLOCA. The overall results of code predictions for the two models closely agree, and the vessel global parameters for the two models are also in good agreement. However, the computer times for the two calculations are significantly different. The detailed model provides additional information that is unavailable with the less detailed model, such as temperature and void fraction distributions throughout different regions of the vessel. During the 60-s transient, the upper head in the detailed model shows extensive voiding. The upper head in the coarse model also shows voiding; however, the extent and exact location of the voiding are not available in the coarse model. During this transient, the core region does not show extensive voiding; however, the detailed model shows some localized boiling. The results indicate that the coarse model is sufficient for 4-in. SBLOCA studies. The computer time associated with TRAC-PF1/MOD1 calculation of the extremely detailed model is ∼100 times longer than the coarse model.