ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Robotics & Remote Systems
The Mission of the Robotics and Remote Systems Division is to promote the development and application of immersive simulation, robotics, and remote systems for hazardous environments for the purpose of reducing hazardous exposure to individuals, reducing environmental hazards and reducing the cost of performing work.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Bahram Nassersharif, James S. Peery, Evelyn M. Mullen, Stephen R. Behling
Nuclear Technology | Volume 94 | Number 1 | April 1991 | Pages 28-43
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT91-A16219
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This study evaluates two significantly different models of a Westinghouse 414 reactor system using the TRAC-PF1/MOD1 computer code for a small-break loss-of-coolant accident (SBLOCA). A coarse threedimensional model of the reactor vessel is developed. In the coarse model, three of the four reactor coolant loops are combined into one loop. A detailed three-dimensional model of the reactor vessel is also developed. In the detailed model, each of the four coolant loops is modeled separately. Both models are run to steady-state convergence until the calculated system parameters are in good agreement. In addition, the steady-state results of both models closely match operational parameters given in the final safety analysis report. From the self-consistent steady-state conditions, a 60-s transient calculation is performed with each model. The transient simulates a 4-in. SBLOCA. The overall results of code predictions for the two models closely agree, and the vessel global parameters for the two models are also in good agreement. However, the computer times for the two calculations are significantly different. The detailed model provides additional information that is unavailable with the less detailed model, such as temperature and void fraction distributions throughout different regions of the vessel. During the 60-s transient, the upper head in the detailed model shows extensive voiding. The upper head in the coarse model also shows voiding; however, the extent and exact location of the voiding are not available in the coarse model. During this transient, the core region does not show extensive voiding; however, the detailed model shows some localized boiling. The results indicate that the coarse model is sufficient for 4-in. SBLOCA studies. The computer time associated with TRAC-PF1/MOD1 calculation of the extremely detailed model is ∼100 times longer than the coarse model.