ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NSTX-U magnet bundle is delivered to PPPL and prepared for installation
The central magnet bundle for the National Spherical Torus Experiment–Upgrade (NSTX-U) at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory has been delivered to the facility in New Jersey, the national lab recently reported. The school bus–sized, 23,000-pound magnet bundle, manufactured at Elytt Energy in Bilbao, Spain, consists of a toroidal field magnet system and an ohmic-heating magnet system.
J. C. Courtney, K. R. Ferguson, J. P. Bacca
Nuclear Technology | Volume 73 | Number 1 | April 1986 | Pages 30-41
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT86-A16199
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Hot Fuel Examination Facility/South, located at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, supports the nation’s nuclear energy program by providing a facility for destructive and nondestructive testing of reactor fuels and materials. Irradiated subassemblies and test devices are transferred from the adjacent Experimental Breeder Reactor II or other irradiation facilities into the hot cells. The reliability of those systems required to inhibit the release of radioactivity to the environment is reviewed, and the operations at the facility are described. For each of two hypothetical accidents, release fractions were developed for noble gases, iodines, cesiums, and particulate radionuclides based on realistic but conservative data. The methodologies of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)— both ICRP-2 and ICRP-30—were used to determine the radiological consequences at off-site receptors. By either technique, dose commitments from inhalation and submersion were small fractions of current federal guidelines. The relative contribution of each radionuclide was determined; iodine and cesium were more significant than plutonium for the decay times considered.