ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Eugene W. Sucov, Chok Ken Liang
Nuclear Technology | Volume 25 | Number 4 | April 1975 | Pages 714-721
Technical Paper | Reactor Siting | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A16127
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A rating method first identifies and evaluates the influence of various proponents in a, siting controversy and then combines these strength measures into an overall measure of the degree of acceptance of a proposed power plant by the community. The operating strength, OS, of an individual or group relevant to the controversy is defined to be the product of its relative significance, RS, or influence and its value judgment, VJ. That is, OSi = RSi × VJi, where i refers to the specific subject being analyzed. The function VJi can take on positive values (supporting the proposed plant) or negative values (opposing). The balance of forces supporting or opposing the plant is summarized by a single quantity, the total operating strength of the community, The above methodology was applied to a specific recent controversy. Citizen groups were found to be strongly opposed to the proposed plant, as expected, while the occupational groups strongly favored it. Influential individuals were, on balance, only slightly opposed to the project. The general public was strongly accepting of the plant and was decisive in causing the total operating strength of the community, OSTOT, be favorable to the power plant.