ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Operations & Power
Members focus on the dissemination of knowledge and information in the area of power reactors with particular application to the production of electric power and process heat. The division sponsors meetings on the coverage of applied nuclear science and engineering as related to power plants, non-power reactors, and other nuclear facilities. It encourages and assists with the dissemination of knowledge pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of nuclear facilities through professional staff development, information exchange, and supporting the generation of viable solutions to current issues.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
N. P. Goldstein, K. H. Sun, J. L. Gonzalez
Nuclear Technology | Volume 23 | Number 3 | September 1974 | Pages 328-336
Technical Paper | Analysis | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A15925
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission is presently considering lowering the limits of radioiodine release from nuclear power plants by a factor of 30 000 below the current levels listed in its Federal Regulations. This proposed limit corresponds to an environmental concentration of 3 × 10 −15 µCi/ml of air for 131I,with somewhat similar values for other iodine isotopes. This represents a very small amount of radioactivity, corresponding to ∼1 dis/sec in a cube of air 95 ft on a side. We have carried out experiments to determine the lowest radioiodine concentrations that can be measured using high volume collection of air in triethyldiamine-impregnated charcoal and by counting the adsorbed radioactivity with a shielded Ge(Li) counter. For this purpose, we have measured the concentrations of 131I and 133I in air at the fence line of a large boiling-water-reactor plant and obtained 7.6 × 10 −14 and 2.9 × 10−14 µCi/ ml, respectively. In addition, concentration of 131I in the form of fallout at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, two weeks after the Chinese nuclear bomb test of June 27, 1973, was found to be 4.6 × 10−15 µCi/ml. The main limitation in the ultimate sensitivity of measurements of this sort lies in the statistical separation of the signal from the background. From our results, we have estimated that 131I and 133 I peaks at the proposed U.S. Atomic Energy Commission limit can be separated from the background with standard deviations of 15 and 30%, respectively, using a total of 7 days for collection and counting. The corresponding figures for a modern state-of-the-art Ge(Li) detector were shown to be 7% for 131I and 15% for 133I. In addition, our measurements possess systematic errors totaling ∼20%.