ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Human Factors, Instrumentation & Controls
Improving task performance, system reliability, system and personnel safety, efficiency, and effectiveness are the division's main objectives. Its major areas of interest include task design, procedures, training, instrument and control layout and placement, stress control, anthropometrics, psychological input, and motivation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Young S. Ham, Shivakumar Sitaraman
Nuclear Technology | Volume 175 | Number 2 | August 2011 | Pages 401-418
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT11-A12312
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A novel methodology to detect diversion of spent fuel from pressurized water reactors (PWRs) has been developed in order to address a long unsolved safeguards verification problem for an international safeguards organization such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) or European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM). The concept involves inserting tiny neutron and gamma detectors into the guide tubes of a spent fuel assembly (SFA) and measuring the signals. The guide tubes form a quadrant symmetric pattern in the various PWR fuel product lines, and the neutron and gamma signals from these various locations are processed to obtain a unique signature for an undisturbed SFA. Signatures based on the neutron and gamma signals individually or in a combination can be developed. Removal of fuel pins from the SFA will cause the signatures to be visibly perturbed thus enabling the detection of diversion. All of the required signal processing to obtain signatures can be performed on standard laptop computers.Monte Carlo simulation studies and a set of controlled experiments with actual commercial PWR SFAs were performed, and they validated this novel methodology. Based on the simulation studies and benchmarking measurements, the methodology promises to be a powerful and practical way to detect partial defects that constitute 10% or more of the total active fuel pins. This far exceeds the IAEA goal that for SFAs that can be dismantled at the facility - which is essentially the case for most PWR fuel - the partial defect test used should assure that at least half the fuel pins are present in each SFA. The methodology does not rely on any operator-provided data like burnup or cooling time and does not require movement of the SFA from the storage rack in the spent-fuel pool.