ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
On moving fast and breaking things
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
So much of what is happening in federal nuclear policy these days seems driven by a common approach popularized in the technology sector. Silicon Valley calls it “move fast and break things,” a phrase originally associated with Facebook’s early culture under Mark Zuckerberg. The idea emerged in the early 2000s as software companies discovered that rapid iteration, frequent experimentation, and a willingness to tolerate failure could dramatically accelerate innovation. This philosophy helped drive the growth of the social media, smartphones, cloud computing, and digital platforms that now underpin modern economic and social life.
Today, that mindset is also influencing federal nuclear policy. The Trump administration views accelerated nuclear deployment as part of a broader competition with China for technological and AI leadership. In that context, it seems willing to accept greater operational risk in pursuit of strategic advantage and long-term economic and security objectives.
Michael D. Allen, Harlan W. Stockman, Kenneth O. Reil, Arthur J. Grimley
Nuclear Technology | Volume 92 | Number 2 | November 1990 | Pages 214-228
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT90-A34472
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
High-burnup uranium dioxide reactor fuel was heated in-pile at ∼2490 K in a reducing atmosphere (33% H2 in argon) for 16 min. Fission product aerosols and vapors released from the fuel were collected on a series of sequentially opened filters; the fractions of the original fuel inventory collected on the filters were f Cs = 0.56, f I = 0.38, f Ba = 0.078, f Sr = 0.053, f Eu = 0.064, and f Te < 0.002. The measured release rates for nonvolatile fission products were much higher than predicted by existing release codes, whereas tellurium release was much lower. Posttest examination of the fuel indicates extensive fuel/clad interaction, fuel swelling, and infiltration of the fuel by a zirconium-rich metallic melt; this melt kept oxygen potentials in the fuel very low. The low oxygen potentials and fuel disruption may account for the discrepancy between release codes and the test release results.