ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
The top 10 states of nuclear
The past few years have seen a concerted effort from many U.S. states to encourage nuclear development. The momentum behind nuclear-friendly policies has grown considerably, with many states repealing moratoriums, courting nuclear developers and suppliers, and in some cases creating advisory groups and road maps to push deployment of new nuclear reactors.
Massimiliano Rosa, James S. Warsa, Jae H. Chang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 164 | Number 3 | March 2010 | Pages 248-263
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE09-26
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A Fourier analysis is conducted for the discrete ordinates, or SN, approximation of the neutron transport problem solved with Richardson iteration (source iteration) and Richardson iteration preconditioned with transport synthetic acceleration (TSA), using the inexact parallel block-Jacobi (IPBJ) algorithm both in slab and two-dimensional Cartesian geometry. Both traditional, or “beta,” TSA (TTSA) and a modified TSA (MTSA), in which only the scattering in the low-order equations is reduced by some nonnegative factor < 1, are considered.The results for the unaccelerated algorithm show that convergence of IPBJ can degrade, leading in particular to stagnation of the generalized minimum residual method with restart parameter m, GMRES(m), in problems containing optically thin subdomains. The IPBJ algorithm preconditioned with TTSA can be effective, provided the parameter is properly tuned for a given scattering ratio c, but is potentially unstable. Compared to TTSA, MTSA is less sensitive to the choice of , more effective for the same computational effort, measured in terms of the effective scattering ratio c′, and it is unconditionally stable.