ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Isotopes & Radiation
Members are devoted to applying nuclear science and engineering technologies involving isotopes, radiation applications, and associated equipment in scientific research, development, and industrial processes. Their interests lie primarily in education, industrial uses, biology, medicine, and health physics. Division committees include Analytical Applications of Isotopes and Radiation, Biology and Medicine, Radiation Applications, Radiation Sources and Detection, and Thermal Power Sources.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Tommy Coissieux, Julien Politello, Claire Vaglio-Gaudard, Karim Ammar
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 8 | August 2023 | Pages 1717-1732
Technical papers from: PHYSOR 2022 | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2167471
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
CABRI is an experimental reactor at the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) used to study fuel behavior during reactivity insertion transients. As these transients have a high level of multiphysics, it is important to develop suitable modeling and simulation tools to simulate them in order to be able to optimize testing and control of experimental conditions. This paper focuses on the development and validation of the neutron deterministic APOLLO3® calculation scheme that is included in the CABRI neutronic/thermal-hydraulic multiphysics coupled simulation tool; it represents the first stage of a stepwise validation process for the CABRI multiphysics simulation tool. The neutron calculation scheme is based on a classical two-step approach. The first step consists of a 281-energy-group flux calculation with the TDT-MOC (Method of Characteristics) solver for nuclear data space and energy collapsing for the different CABRI assembly clusters. The biases on a two-dimensional (2D) core neutron calculation due to self-shielding correction and collapsing on a restricted pattern are investigated by means of comparison with a direct full 2D calculation on a quarter core. The second step relies on a three-dimensional (3D) core calculation. Two approaches are presented. The first one consists of a best-effort approach corresponding to a 3D pin-scale description of the core, performing a transport calculation with the SN solver MINARET. And, the second one, a best-estimate approach, which will be implemented for kinetics calculations, relies on solving a simplified transport SPN equation in the solver MINOS with an exact 3D cell description of the core. The best-estimate calculation scheme is then used to analyze three experimental CABRI transients. A stepwise validation process is followed to quantify the calculation biases on physical parameters such as reactivity, reaction rates, and total core power at each step using static reference calculations with the stochastic code TRIPOLI4® or transient experimental data. The next development stage toward a multiphysics calculation scheme will be implementation and validation of coupling with a core thermal-hydraulic model.
