ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Van Khanh Hoang, Odmaa Sambuu, Jun Nishiyama, Toru Obara
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 7 | July 2023 | Pages 1520-1533
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2153639
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This study assesses a Rotational Fuel-Shuffling Breed-and-Burn (RFBB) fast reactor that operates in breed-and-burn (B&B) mode with a rotational fuel-shuffling scheme and remains within the 200 displacements per atom (DPA) radiation damage constraint of currently verified cladding materials. The design is based on a commercial-scale fast burner reactor called the Super Power Reactor Innovative Small Module (S-PRISM) reactor. To reduce the high DPA values of discharged fuels, the melt-refining process developed in the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II) project is adopted in this study. The effects of the melt-refining process on the performance of the RFBB are investigated via five scenarios and compared with a core to which the melt-refining process is not applied: Scenario I, “Homogenization,” occurs without the removal of fission products (FPs) during the melt-refining process; Scenario II, “Homogenization and FP Removal,” occurs with the removal of FPs to a fraction similar to that in the melt-refining process developed in the EBR-II project; Scenario III, “Homogenization, FP Removal, and Make-Up,” is similar to Scenario II but makes up fuel losses with natural uranium; Scenario IV, “With 1% TRU [transuranics] Losses,” is similar to Scenario III but is evaluated with 1% of actinides not recovered; Scenario V, “With 10% TRU Losses,” is similar to Scenario III but is evaluated with 10% of actinides not recovered. The results show that it is neutronically and thermal hydraulically feasible to establish a B&B mode with the rotational fuel-shuffling scheme and by reconditioning the fuel whenever its cladding reaches its proven 200 DPA radiation damage limit. In Scenario V, the core is subcritical due to a large number of actinides not being recovered during the melt-refining process. The cores of the other scenarios are all critical. The cores of scenarios in which FPs are removed during the melt-refining process have higher excess reactivity than that of the core of Scenario I (“Homogenization”) and that of the core to which the melt-refining process is not applied. The numerical analyses also show that in scenarios that include making up fuel losses during melt refining, the core is fed with more natural uranium make-up fuel during operation and thus has lower burnup. Other characteristics, such as power density distributions, neutron flux profiles, and fertile and fissile nuclide density distributions, are all stable during operation.
