ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2025)
April 27–30, 2025
Denver, CO|The Westin Denver Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2025
Latest News
Argonne’s METL gears up to test more sodium fast reactor components
Argonne National Laboratory has successfully swapped out an aging cold trap in the sodium test loop called METL (Mechanisms Engineering Test Loop), the Department of Energy announced April 23. The upgrade is the first of its kind in the United States in more than 30 years, according to the DOE, and will help test components and operations for the sodium-cooled fast reactors being developed now.
Van Khanh Hoang, Odmaa Sambuu, Jun Nishiyama, Toru Obara
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 7 | July 2023 | Pages 1520-1533
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2153639
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This study assesses a Rotational Fuel-Shuffling Breed-and-Burn (RFBB) fast reactor that operates in breed-and-burn (B&B) mode with a rotational fuel-shuffling scheme and remains within the 200 displacements per atom (DPA) radiation damage constraint of currently verified cladding materials. The design is based on a commercial-scale fast burner reactor called the Super Power Reactor Innovative Small Module (S-PRISM) reactor. To reduce the high DPA values of discharged fuels, the melt-refining process developed in the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II) project is adopted in this study. The effects of the melt-refining process on the performance of the RFBB are investigated via five scenarios and compared with a core to which the melt-refining process is not applied: Scenario I, “Homogenization,” occurs without the removal of fission products (FPs) during the melt-refining process; Scenario II, “Homogenization and FP Removal,” occurs with the removal of FPs to a fraction similar to that in the melt-refining process developed in the EBR-II project; Scenario III, “Homogenization, FP Removal, and Make-Up,” is similar to Scenario II but makes up fuel losses with natural uranium; Scenario IV, “With 1% TRU [transuranics] Losses,” is similar to Scenario III but is evaluated with 1% of actinides not recovered; Scenario V, “With 10% TRU Losses,” is similar to Scenario III but is evaluated with 10% of actinides not recovered. The results show that it is neutronically and thermal hydraulically feasible to establish a B&B mode with the rotational fuel-shuffling scheme and by reconditioning the fuel whenever its cladding reaches its proven 200 DPA radiation damage limit. In Scenario V, the core is subcritical due to a large number of actinides not being recovered during the melt-refining process. The cores of the other scenarios are all critical. The cores of scenarios in which FPs are removed during the melt-refining process have higher excess reactivity than that of the core of Scenario I (“Homogenization”) and that of the core to which the melt-refining process is not applied. The numerical analyses also show that in scenarios that include making up fuel losses during melt refining, the core is fed with more natural uranium make-up fuel during operation and thus has lower burnup. Other characteristics, such as power density distributions, neutron flux profiles, and fertile and fissile nuclide density distributions, are all stable during operation.
