ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Young Members Group
The Young Members Group works to encourage and enable all young professional members to be actively involved in the efforts and endeavors of the Society at all levels (Professional Divisions, ANS Governance, Local Sections, etc.) as they transition from the role of a student to the role of a professional. It sponsors non-technical workshops and meetings that provide professional development and networking opportunities for young professionals, collaborates with other Divisions and Groups in developing technical and non-technical content for topical and national meetings, encourages its members to participate in the activities of the Groups and Divisions that are closely related to their professional interests as well as in their local sections, introduces young members to the rules and governance structure of the Society, and nominates young professionals for awards and leadership opportunities available to members.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Shifa Wu, Jiashuang Wan, Zhi Chen, Longtao Liao, Kai Xiao, Pengfei Wang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 4 | April 2023 | Pages 660-675
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2123204
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To improve the economy and safety of small pressurized water reactors (SPWRs) with flexible operating characteristics, the reactor power control system should process excellent robustness to provide satisfactory control performances at different operating conditions. This paper proposes four control strategies for reactor power control of SPWRs based on the linear quadratic Gaussian with loop transfer recovery (LQG/LTR) robust control method, including the single-loop reactor power feedback control (RPFC), single-loop average temperature feedback control, dual-loop feedback control, and modified dual-loop feedback control (MDFC) strategies. The corresponding LQG/LTR controllers in the reactor power control system of a SPWR were designed to assess the performance of the four control strategies. The simulation results show that the LQG/LTR controller with the MDFC strategy can provide good control performances for both reactor power and average coolant temperature among the four control strategies while the controller-based single-loop feedback control shows poor control of the reactor power or average coolant temperature. Meanwhile, compared with the existing conventional reactor power control system, the designed robust control system employing the MDFC strategy can provide better control performance for the reactor power and average coolant temperature in full-power operation of 100% to 90% rated power and low-power operation of 25% to 35% rated power with the differential control rod worth taken as 4 pcm/step and 24 pcm/step, indicating its effectiveness and superiority.