ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Empowering the next generation: ANS’s newest book focuses on careers in nuclear energy
A new career guide for the nuclear energy industry is now available: The Nuclear Empowered Workforce by Earnestine Johnson. Drawing on more than 30 years of experience across 16 nuclear facilities, Johnson offers a practical, insightful look into some of the many career paths available in commercial nuclear power. To mark the release, Johnson sat down with Nuclear News for a wide-ranging conversation about her career, her motivation for writing the book, and her advice for the next generation of nuclear professionals.
When Johnson began her career at engineering services company Stone & Webster, she entered a field still reeling from the effects of the Three Mile Island incident in 1979, nearly 15 years earlier. Her hiring cohort was the first group of new engineering graduates the company had brought on since TMI, a reflection of the industry-wide pause in nuclear construction. Her first long-term assignment—at the Millstone site in Waterford, Conn., helping resolve design issues stemming from TMI—marked the beginning of a long and varied career that spanned positions across the country.
Kim Wei Chin, Rei Kimura, Hiroshi Sagara, Kosuke Tanabe
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 7 | July 2022 | Pages 852-872
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.2018927
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Past studies validated the feasibility of the photofission reaction ratio (PFRR) method using both Gaussian and bremsstrahlung photons to estimate the isotopic composition of nuclear fuel materials without relying on their self-generated neutron information. However, the current PFRR method cannot solve a multinuclide system with more than two nuclides because the instability of the inverse matrix increases with the addition of the number of nuclides. Thus, this research proposes a numerical method for solving the simultaneous equations of a three-nuclide system onto PFRR to estimate the isotopic composition of nuclides. The results show good reproducibility with all cases maintained within a 10% isotopic composition difference except cases 6 and 7 of the first two photon energy combination schemes with maximum composition differences of 15.6% and 13.9% for 10% actual composition, respectively. A 20% actual composition of case 5 for the second photon energy combination scheme has a deviation of 10.6%, which is slightly larger than the 10% composition difference too. Out of three photon energy combination schemes, 6 MeV – 6.5 MeV – 11 MeV has the highest coefficient of determination for all three nuclides and the smallest deviation of below 10% composition difference. Random sampling with normal distribution was performed on the loss to photofission particles from MCNP with 200 sets for each 10 cases on the 6 MeV – 7 MeV – 11 MeV photon energy combination to study the stochastic errors. The isotopic compositions were calculated with the same numerical method, and the difference between the estimated and actual compositions that resulted were fitted with R. The fitting results show good agreement within 91.5% confidence intervals.