ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2024
Latest News
Nuclear new build procurement considerations
It may seem counterintuitive, but the best time to enhance the ability to support operations and maintenance for a new plant is before construction starts. This is one of many lessons learned by the currently operating nuclear fleet. As construction and startup of many nuclear facilities was completed, it quickly became evident that the ability to efficiently support operations and maintenance was limited. Most of the information necessary to establish and manage procurement of spare and replacement items, maintenance, and configuration of the facilities was unavailable and had to be gathered on a case-by-case, “on-demand” basis. Absence of necessary information and the associated challenges resulted in the need for staff augmentation and multiyear-long projects to develop equipment bills of material and maintenance programs and to perform technical evaluations for the huge quantities of spare and replacement items being requested.
H. Naik, R. J. Singh, W. Jang, S. P. Dange
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 4 | April 2022 | Pages 433-454
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1993425
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the thermal neutron–induced fission of 232U, cumulative and independent yields of various fission products within the mass ranges of 72 to 107 and 123 to 158 have been measured using an off-line gamma-ray spectrometric technique. The fission yields were determined relative to the yield of a monitor product 92Sr. Charge distribution correction was applied on the cumulative yields to obtain the post-neutron mass yield distribution. Mass yield distribution parameters such as full-width at tenth-maximum of light and heavy mass wings, average light mass number <AL> and heavy mass number <AH>, and average number of emitted neutrons <ν> were obtained. Data from the present and earlier work on the 232U(nth,f) reaction were compared with similar data of the 235U(nth,f) reaction. It was found that the mass chain yield distribution in the 232U(nth,f) reaction is asymmetric with two major humps as in the case of the 235U(nth,f) reaction. Besides this, in the 232U(nth,f) reaction, the mass yield distribution shows a small third hump for the symmetric fission products. It was also found that the standard II asymmetric mode of fission is favorable in the 232U(nth,f) reaction whereas the standard I asymmetric mode of fission is favorable in the 235U(nth,f) reaction.