ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Shifting the paradigm of supply chain
Chad Wolf
When I began my nuclear career, I was coached up in the nuclear energy culture of the day to “run silent, run deep,” a mindset rooted in the U.S. Navy’s submarine philosophy. That was the norm—until Fukushima.
The nuclear renaissance that many had envisioned hit a wall. The focus shifted from expansion to survival. Many utility communications efforts pivoted from silence to broadcast, showcasing nuclear energy’s elegance and reliability. Nevertheless, despite being clean baseload 24/7 power that delivered a 90 percent capacity factor or higher, nuclear energy was painted as risky and expensive (alongside energy policies and incentives that favored renewables).
Economics became a driving force threatening to shutter nuclear power. The Delivering the Nuclear Promise initiative launched in 2015 challenged the industry to sustain high performance yet cut costs by up to 30 percent.
E. Blain, Y. Danon, D. P. Barry, B. E. Epping, A. Youmans, M. J. Rapp, A. M. Daskalakis, R. C. Block
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 2 | February 2022 | Pages 121-132
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1961542
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron scattering from a copper sample was measured at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute utilizing the quasi-differential method. The measurement spanned the energy range from 0.5 to 20 MeV using the high-energy scattering system and from 2 keV to 0.5 MeV using the new mid-energy scattering system. Copper was selected as a material of interest to measure due to large discrepancies between experiments and simulations of the Zeus benchmark. The Zeus benchmark consists of a copper reflected highly enriched uranium system, and the angular distribution of copper scattering was thought to potentially be the cause of the discrepancy. The copper measurements found differences in the scattering response particularly in the incident energy region from 1 to 2 MeV for the high-energy measurement and from 2 to 4 keV in the mid-energy system. These differences are particularly noticeable at angles near 90 deg in the high-energy system and back angles in the mid-energy system. Additionally, for ENDF/B-VIII.0 there is a large discrepancy at the forward angle in the energy range around 0.5 MeV. For these reasons, a new evaluation of copper scattering utilizing these results is recommended and perhaps could help to improve the agreement with the Zeus benchmarks.