ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fuel Cycle & Waste Management
Devoted to all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle including waste management, worldwide. Division specific areas of interest and involvement include uranium conversion and enrichment; fuel fabrication, management (in-core and ex-core) and recycle; transportation; safeguards; high-level, low-level and mixed waste management and disposal; public policy and program management; decontamination and decommissioning environmental restoration; and excess weapons materials disposition.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Qicang Shen, Brendan Kochunas, Yunlin Xu, Sooyoung Choi, Thomas Downar
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 195 | Number 7 | July 2021 | Pages 741-765
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1866388
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Transient Multilevel (TML) scheme in the MPACT code has reduced the computational burden for three-dimensional, full-core, time-dependent reactor simulations with pin-resolved detail. However, the total computational cost is still large for practical applications. In this paper, we present a new method that uses a one-group coarse mesh finite difference (1GCMFD) approach to further accelerate the TML scheme. Since multigroup coarse mesh finite difference (MGCMFD) calculations in TML dominate the simulation run time, the 1GCMFD method developed here is shown to reduce the overall computational time by as much as 50% for some large-scale applications. The 1GCMFD method accelerated the calculation primarily by accelerating the convergence of the source for MGCMFD calculations through 1G/MGCMFD iteration. A new 1GCMFD level was implemented in the TML scheme (TML-4) assuming that the energy distribution of the scalar flux shape varies more slowly than the energy-integrated amplitude of the scalar flux. Various numerical cases were used to investigate the practicality of the 1G/MGCMFD iteration and TML-4 scheme. Numerical results show that using the 1G/MGCMFD iteration with a dynamic iteration strategy alone does better capture the evolution of the amplitude function when the scalar flux distribution in energy space varies rapidly and thus provides more accurate results. However, TML-4 is more efficient in capturing the variation of the energy-integrated amplitude when cross-section changes are small and feedback dominates the change of the reactivity. For smaller problems, the 1G/MGCMFD iteration and the new TML-4 scheme can reduce the run time of the coarse mesh finite difference (CMFD) solver by 50% and the total run time by at least 16%. For large-scale, full-core problems, the run time of the CMFD solver can be reduced by 78% and the total run time by as much as 47%.