ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Education, Training & Workforce Development
The Education, Training & Workforce Development Division provides communication among the academic, industrial, and governmental communities through the exchange of views and information on matters related to education, training and workforce development in nuclear and radiological science, engineering, and technology. Industry leaders, education and training professionals, and interested students work together through Society-sponsored meetings and publications, to enrich their professional development, to educate the general public, and to advance nuclear and radiological science and engineering.
Meeting Spotlight
International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2025)
April 27–30, 2025
Denver, CO|The Westin Denver Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2025
Latest News
Argonne’s METL gears up to test more sodium fast reactor components
Argonne National Laboratory has successfully swapped out an aging cold trap in the sodium test loop called METL (Mechanisms Engineering Test Loop), the Department of Energy announced April 23. The upgrade is the first of its kind in the United States in more than 30 years, according to the DOE, and will help test components and operations for the sodium-cooled fast reactors being developed now.
Yuxuan Liu, Kyle Vaughn, Brendan Kochunas, Thomas Downar
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 195 | Number 1 | January 2021 | Pages 50-68
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1780853
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Over the years, significant validation work for the neutronics code MPACT has been performed against zero-power critical benchmarks and measured data from operating nuclear power plants. Among all of these efforts, however, validation of the pin-resolved capability in MPACT has been limited by the public availability of experimental data and to a lesser degree availability of measurement techniques and facilities that provide such detailed data. Recently, new measurement results to experimentally determine the reaction rate along the pellet radius from the IPEN/MB-01 research reactor facility (IPEN) have been published as a benchmark in the International Reactor Physics Experiment Project handbook. In this paper, we examine MPACT simulation results for several IPEN benchmark experiments with emphasis on the intrapin reaction rate measurements. The IPEN critical experiments with variations in system temperature and gadolinium loadings are modeled first with the latest MPACT cross-section library and linear source (LS) method of characteristics (MOC) capability. The MPACT results of two-dimensional (2-D) models with axial buckling are within 160 pcm from the experimental eigenvalues using the flat source MOC. Using the LS MOC, the errors are no more than 70 pcm, and the temperature trend of various cases is smaller. The MPACT three-dimensional models with LS show slightly worse comparisons than the 2-D models, which may be due to the isotropic transverse leakage and homogenized cross-section approximations of the 2-D/one-dimensional solver. For the reaction rate validation, MPACT produces intrapin reaction rate results within 2σ of the experiment and shows excellent agreement with the Monte Carlo solution. The observed discrepancies between the simulated results and experiment for the fission rate measurements are discussed. The kinetics parameters measured in another IPEN experiment are also compared with MPACT simulations using different kinetics data sources. According to the validation results, JENDL-4.0 and Santamarina et al.’s data are recommended for MPACT transient calculations.
