ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Operations & Power
Members focus on the dissemination of knowledge and information in the area of power reactors with particular application to the production of electric power and process heat. The division sponsors meetings on the coverage of applied nuclear science and engineering as related to power plants, non-power reactors, and other nuclear facilities. It encourages and assists with the dissemination of knowledge pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of nuclear facilities through professional staff development, information exchange, and supporting the generation of viable solutions to current issues.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
IAEA’s nuclear security center offers hands-on training
In the past year and a half, the International Atomic Energy Agency has established the Nuclear Security Training and Demonstration Center (NSTDC) to help countries strengthen their nuclear security regimes. The center, located at the IAEA’s Seibersdorf laboratories outside Vienna, Austria, has been operational since October 2023.
Yuxuan Liu, Kyle Vaughn, Brendan Kochunas, Thomas Downar
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 195 | Number 1 | January 2021 | Pages 50-68
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1780853
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Over the years, significant validation work for the neutronics code MPACT has been performed against zero-power critical benchmarks and measured data from operating nuclear power plants. Among all of these efforts, however, validation of the pin-resolved capability in MPACT has been limited by the public availability of experimental data and to a lesser degree availability of measurement techniques and facilities that provide such detailed data. Recently, new measurement results to experimentally determine the reaction rate along the pellet radius from the IPEN/MB-01 research reactor facility (IPEN) have been published as a benchmark in the International Reactor Physics Experiment Project handbook. In this paper, we examine MPACT simulation results for several IPEN benchmark experiments with emphasis on the intrapin reaction rate measurements. The IPEN critical experiments with variations in system temperature and gadolinium loadings are modeled first with the latest MPACT cross-section library and linear source (LS) method of characteristics (MOC) capability. The MPACT results of two-dimensional (2-D) models with axial buckling are within 160 pcm from the experimental eigenvalues using the flat source MOC. Using the LS MOC, the errors are no more than 70 pcm, and the temperature trend of various cases is smaller. The MPACT three-dimensional models with LS show slightly worse comparisons than the 2-D models, which may be due to the isotropic transverse leakage and homogenized cross-section approximations of the 2-D/one-dimensional solver. For the reaction rate validation, MPACT produces intrapin reaction rate results within 2σ of the experiment and shows excellent agreement with the Monte Carlo solution. The observed discrepancies between the simulated results and experiment for the fission rate measurements are discussed. The kinetics parameters measured in another IPEN experiment are also compared with MPACT simulations using different kinetics data sources. According to the validation results, JENDL-4.0 and Santamarina et al.’s data are recommended for MPACT transient calculations.
