ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Milan Hanus, Jean C. Ragusa
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 194 | Number 10 | October 2020 | Pages 873-893
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1767436
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This work is motivated by the need to solve realistic problems with complex energy, space, and angle dependence, which requires parallel multigroup transport sweeps combined with efficient acceleration of the thermal upscattering. We present various iterative schemes based on the two-grid (TG) diffusion synthetic acceleration (DSA) method. In its original form, the TG method is used with the Gauss-Seidel iterative scheme over energy groups, which makes it impractical for parallel computation. We therefore formulate a Jacobi-style version. Furthermore, we propose a new scheme that reduces the overall number of transport sweeps by removing the need to fully converge the within-group iterations before the TG step. This becomes possible by adding an additional within-group DSA solve after each transport sweep. Fourier analyses are carried out to ascertain the effectiveness of the proposed scheme, with further corroboration from massively parallel numerical results from practical problem calculations. We discuss several implementation strategies of the new scheme, paying particular attention to the consequences on the overall efficiency of adding additional diffusion solves with a relatively low number of degrees of freedom per process.