ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
Utility Working Conference and Vendor Technology Expo (UWC 2024)
August 4–7, 2024
Marco Island, FL|JW Marriott Marco Island
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2024
Nuclear Technology
July 2024
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC engineers share their expertise at the University of Puerto Rico
Robert Roche-Rivera and Marcos Rolón-Acevedo are licensed professional engineers who work at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. They are also alumni of the University of Puerto Rico–Mayagüez (UPRM) and have been sharing their knowledge and experience with students at their alma mater since last year, serving as adjunct professors in the university’s Department of Mechanical Engineering. During the 2023–2024 school year, they each taught two courses: Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering, and Nuclear Power Plant Engineering.
P. Deng, B. K. Jeon, H. Park, W. S. Yang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 193 | Number 12 | December 2019 | Pages 1310-1338
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2019.1621617
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For accurate assessment of nuclear heating in fast reactors, a new coupled neutron and gamma heating calculation scheme has been developed based on VARIANT nodal transport solutions of neutron and gamma flux distributions. The MC2-3 code was extended to generate multigroup neutron and gamma cross sections and kinetic energy release in materials (KERMA) factors, and a utility program CURVE was developed to reconstruct detailed pin and duct wall powers from VARIANT output files. The improved heating calculation scheme has been verified against MCNP6 Monte Carlo reference solutions for the Advanced Burner Test Reactor (ABTR) and Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) benchmark problems. Compared to the existing coupled heating calculation method based on DIF3D diffusion theory solutions, the new heating calculation scheme utilizes more accurate gamma cross sections and KERMA factors, accounts for the transport effects, and eliminates the approximations in the existing pin power reconstruction scheme. As a result, it produces more accurate assembly and pin power distributions. For both the ABTR and EBR-II problems, the maximum assembly power error was ~1% in fuel assemblies and ~2% in instrumented structure assemblies, and the maximum error in pin segment powers in an axial node of fuel assembly was ~4%. In the blankets of the EBR-II problem, the maximum error in pin segment powers was increased to ~8%, mainly due to the lower power level and the relatively large error in the nodal power of the VARIANT solution.