ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
P. Deng, B. K. Jeon, H. Park, W. S. Yang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 193 | Number 12 | December 2019 | Pages 1310-1338
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2019.1621617
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For accurate assessment of nuclear heating in fast reactors, a new coupled neutron and gamma heating calculation scheme has been developed based on VARIANT nodal transport solutions of neutron and gamma flux distributions. The MC2-3 code was extended to generate multigroup neutron and gamma cross sections and kinetic energy release in materials (KERMA) factors, and a utility program CURVE was developed to reconstruct detailed pin and duct wall powers from VARIANT output files. The improved heating calculation scheme has been verified against MCNP6 Monte Carlo reference solutions for the Advanced Burner Test Reactor (ABTR) and Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) benchmark problems. Compared to the existing coupled heating calculation method based on DIF3D diffusion theory solutions, the new heating calculation scheme utilizes more accurate gamma cross sections and KERMA factors, accounts for the transport effects, and eliminates the approximations in the existing pin power reconstruction scheme. As a result, it produces more accurate assembly and pin power distributions. For both the ABTR and EBR-II problems, the maximum assembly power error was ~1% in fuel assemblies and ~2% in instrumented structure assemblies, and the maximum error in pin segment powers in an axial node of fuel assembly was ~4%. In the blankets of the EBR-II problem, the maximum error in pin segment powers was increased to ~8%, mainly due to the lower power level and the relatively large error in the nodal power of the VARIANT solution.
