ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Indrajeet Singh, S. B. Degweker, Anurag Gupta
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 189 | Number 2 | February 2018 | Pages 101-119
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1388092
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The fuel in high-temperature reactors (HTRs) is made up of tiny fuel particles (called TRISO particles) dispersed randomly in a graphite matrix. For the commonly used fuels, namely, enriched uranium or low-enriched uranium/233U mixed with Th, this dispersion may be treated as a homogeneous mixture at almost all neutron energies except at the resonances of the major nuclide (238U or 232Th) where the macroscopic cross section is so large that the neutron mean free path is comparable to the fuel kernel radius. In the equivalence theory approach used in many codes based on the WIMS-D library, this heterogeneity is accounted for by the escape cross section from a fuel kernel together with a carefully evaluated Dancoff correction factor.
In HTRs designed to burn plutonium, the fuel kernel contains oxides of various isotopes of Pu, and there is no fertile nuclide. Hence, the macroscopic cross section of the fuel is rather high in the thermal region, i.e., below 4 eV in the WIMS-D library (which also includes the two major resonances of 240Pu and 239Pu). For such fuels, the treatment of neutron transport in the thermal energy range must also include the random heterogeneous distribution of fuel in the graphite matrix. Since the resonance treatment method in the WIMS-D library, described above, is neither available nor applicable for thermal energies, a different method is clearly necessary.
HTR lattice codes such as WIMS and DRAGON use approximate collision probabilities between the various microscopic regions, namely, the fuel kernel, the coating layers, and the graphite matrix in the solution of the multigroup transport equation to account for this heterogeneity. In an earlier paper, we developed a simple though heuristic approach for solving this problem. In the present paper, we develop a more systematic theoretical method for solving the transport equation in a random dispersion by an exact evaluation of the collision probabilities in various regions of the lattice cell. The method has been incorporated in the collision probability code BOXER3. Comparison with benchmarks of Pu-based HTR fuels shows very good agreement thus validating the new approach. The method is likely to have application beyond the problem discussed in the paper.