ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
ARG-US Remote Monitoring Systems: Use Cases and Applications in Nuclear Facilities and During Transportation
As highlighted in the Spring 2024 issue of Radwaste Solutions, researchers at the Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory are developing and deploying ARG-US—meaning “Watchful Guardian”—remote monitoring systems technologies to enhance the safety, security, and safeguards (3S) of packages of nuclear and other radioactive material during storage, transportation, and disposal.
Eva E. Davidson, William R. Martin
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 187 | Number 1 | July 2017 | Pages 1-26
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1294931
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Current Monte Carlo codes use one of three models: (1) the asymptotic scattering model, (2) the free gas scattering model, or (3) the S(α,β) model, depending on the neutron energy and the specific Monte Carlo code. This paper addresses the consequences of using the free gas scattering model, which assumes that the neutron interacts with atoms in thermal motion in a monatomic gas in thermal equilibrium at material temperature T. Most importantly, the free gas model assumes the scattering cross section is constant over the neutron energy range, which is usually a good approximation for light nuclei, but not for heavy nuclei, where the scattering cross section may have several resonances in the epithermal region. Several researchers in the field have shown that the exact resonance scattering model is temperature dependent, and neglecting the resonances in the lower epithermal range can underpredict resonance absorption due to the upscattering phenomenon mentioned above, leading to an overprediction of keff by several hundred pcm. Existing methods to address this issue involve changing the neutron weights or implementing an extra rejection scheme in the free gas sampling scheme, and these all involve performing the collision analysis in the center-of-mass (CM) frame, followed by a conversion back to the laboratory frame to continue the random walk of the neutron.
The goal of this paper was to develop a sampling methodology that (1) accounted for the energy-dependent scattering cross sections in the collision analysis and (2) was performed in the laboratory frame, avoiding the conversion to the CM frame. The energy dependence of the scattering cross section was modeled with even-ordered polynomials (second and fourth order) to approximate the scattering cross section in Blackshaw’s equations for the moments of the differential scattering probability distribution functions. These moments were used to sample the outgoing neutron speed and angle in the laboratory frame on the fly during the random walk of the neutron. Results for criticality studies on fuel pin and fuel assembly calculations using methods developed in this paper showed very close comparison to results using the reference Doppler-broadened rejection correction scheme.
