ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2024
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Christmas Night
Twas the night before Christmas when all through the houseNo electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged in by the chimney with careWith the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Eva E. Davidson, William R. Martin
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 187 | Number 1 | July 2017 | Pages 1-26
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1294931
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Current Monte Carlo codes use one of three models: (1) the asymptotic scattering model, (2) the free gas scattering model, or (3) the S(α,β) model, depending on the neutron energy and the specific Monte Carlo code. This paper addresses the consequences of using the free gas scattering model, which assumes that the neutron interacts with atoms in thermal motion in a monatomic gas in thermal equilibrium at material temperature T. Most importantly, the free gas model assumes the scattering cross section is constant over the neutron energy range, which is usually a good approximation for light nuclei, but not for heavy nuclei, where the scattering cross section may have several resonances in the epithermal region. Several researchers in the field have shown that the exact resonance scattering model is temperature dependent, and neglecting the resonances in the lower epithermal range can underpredict resonance absorption due to the upscattering phenomenon mentioned above, leading to an overprediction of keff by several hundred pcm. Existing methods to address this issue involve changing the neutron weights or implementing an extra rejection scheme in the free gas sampling scheme, and these all involve performing the collision analysis in the center-of-mass (CM) frame, followed by a conversion back to the laboratory frame to continue the random walk of the neutron.
The goal of this paper was to develop a sampling methodology that (1) accounted for the energy-dependent scattering cross sections in the collision analysis and (2) was performed in the laboratory frame, avoiding the conversion to the CM frame. The energy dependence of the scattering cross section was modeled with even-ordered polynomials (second and fourth order) to approximate the scattering cross section in Blackshaw’s equations for the moments of the differential scattering probability distribution functions. These moments were used to sample the outgoing neutron speed and angle in the laboratory frame on the fly during the random walk of the neutron. Results for criticality studies on fuel pin and fuel assembly calculations using methods developed in this paper showed very close comparison to results using the reference Doppler-broadened rejection correction scheme.
