ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Qingmin Zhang, Zhigang Hu, Bangjie Deng, Mengxuan Xu, Yuhang Guo
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 186 | Number 3 | June 2017 | Pages 293-302
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2016.1273619
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The self-powered neutron detector (SPND) is popularly used as an in-core neutron flux monitor in reactors due to its simple structure, self-powered feature. However, its response delay needs compensation to obtain the actual real-time neutron flux for reactor control and protection. In this paper, a simple iterative method for compensating SPND response delay is proposed as well as noise filtering. Two favorable noise filtering methods were compared, and then, the moving average filter was chosen. The governing differential equations were established according to decay mechanism, and then, iterative compensation relations for delay compensation were established by discretization with simplicity and flexibility. The test result shows that the compensated response delay for a prompt jump of neutron flux is only 0.9 s, indicating its effectiveness. Furthermore, the dependence on initial conditions and sampling time interval was also studied, indicating that two initial condition determination modes for two typical detector start-up situations can be chosen correspondingly for delay minimization and critical sampling with a time interval of about 0.7 s, which shows consistency with the Von Neumann stability analysis. Finally, our method has been compared with the Z-transform method and verified with measured current, which showed its better performance.