ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
ARG-US Remote Monitoring Systems: Use Cases and Applications in Nuclear Facilities and During Transportation
As highlighted in the Spring 2024 issue of Radwaste Solutions, researchers at the Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory are developing and deploying ARG-US—meaning “Watchful Guardian”—remote monitoring systems technologies to enhance the safety, security, and safeguards (3S) of packages of nuclear and other radioactive material during storage, transportation, and disposal.
M. P. Sharma, A. K. Nayak
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 184 | Number 2 | October 2016 | Pages 280-291
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE15-112
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Advanced Heavy Water Reactor (AHWR) is a vertical pressure tube–type, heavy water–moderated and boiling light water–cooled natural circulation–based reactor. The fuel bundle of an AHWR contains 54 fuel rods arranged in three concentric rings of 12, 18, and 24 fuel rods. This fuel bundle is divided into a number of imaginary interacting flow passages called subchannels. The transition from single-phase to two-phase flow occurs in a reactor rod bundle with an increase in power. Two-phase flow regimes like bubbly, slug/churn, and annular flow are normally encountered in a reactor rod bundle. Prediction of the thermal margin of the reactor necessitates the determination of the turbulent-mixing rate of the coolant among these subchannels under these flow regimes. Thus, it is vital to evaluate turbulent mixing between the subchannels of an AHWR rod bundle.
In this paper, experiments were carried out to determine the two-phase turbulent-mixing rate in different flow regimes in the simulated subchannels of the reactor. The size of the rod and the pitch in the test were the same as those of an actual rod bundle in the prototype. Three subchannels are considered in 1/12th of the cross section of the rod bundle. Water and air were used as the working fluid, and the turbulent-mixing tests were carried out at atmospheric conditions without addition of heat. The void fraction was varied from 0 to 0.8 under various ranges of superficial liquid velocity. The turbulent-mixing rate was experimentally determined by adding tracer fluid in one subchannel and measuring its concentration in other subchannels at the end of the flow path. The test data were compared with existing models in the literature. It was found that none of the models could predict the measured turbulent-mixing rate in the rod bundle of the reactor.