ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC to add new items to categorical exclusions list
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has identified five categories of action to add to its list of categorical exclusions to reduce its documentation work under National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures.
These revisions are included in the final rule, “Categorical exclusions from environmental review,” which was published in the Federal Register on March 30. The final rule will become effective on April 29.
Yukio Oyama, Kazuaki Kosako, Hiroshi Maekawa
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 115 | Number 1 | September 1993 | Pages 24-37
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A35519
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Angular neutron flux spectra leaking from iron slabs with various thicknesses up to 600 mm have been measured by the time-of-flight technique. The results are compared with calculations by the MCNP Monte Carlo code and the DOT3.5 two-dimensional discrete ordinates code with the JENDL-3 nuclear data file and with ENDF/B-IV. In the DOT3.5 calculations, a cross-section set with a selfshielding correction factor is also applied to examine its effect. The results show that the MCNP calculations based on both files agree very well for the main part of the deeply penetrating neutron spectrum, but the DOT3.5 code without a self-shielding correction underestimates the high-energy flux and the flux in the resonance energy range with increasing slab thickness. The self-shielding correction factor improves the underestimation, but the calculated flux is still smaller than the MCNP calculation.